論文詳細

人文社会科学系 大学院現代社会文化研究科 #紀要論文

市民性教育からみた道徳教育に関する一考察 : 小学校学習指導要領を手がかりに

AI解説:
本稿は、道徳教育のあり方を市民性教育を手掛かりに考察することを目的としています。文部科学省は2012年に「子どもの「命」を守るために」と題する総合的な取組方針を提示し、2015年には道徳の教科化が正式に決定しました。これにより、小学校では2018年度から道徳教育が特別な教科として完全実施されました。しかし、道徳の教科化に関しては、国際人権論に反するといった問題や、国家が人格的価値を統制・管理する危険性などが指摘されています。本稿では、道徳教育が偏った価値観を押しつけるものではなく、児童生徒が主体的に考え、道徳性や道徳的実践力を修得するためのあり方を再検討する必要性を提起しています。
AI解説を見る
著者名:
山本 詩織
掲載誌名:
現代社会文化研究
巻:
68
ページ:
1 - 13
発行日:
2019-02
著者による要約:
This study examines moral and citizenship and clarifies their structural relationship. Citizenship education is an education concept that includes moral education and the premise of both of these forms of education, is that the learner becomes aware of their sovereign state and its formation. There are two conditions that form moral and citizenship education. The first condition is when the society determines that human rights, such as the right to life, are secured. The second condition is when a learner recognizes that they have their own determination over their own life. In the elementary school curriculum guidelines revised in 2017, the life of the learner was considered for the current position of moral education. It became clear that learners did not recognize their own determination clearly and this was indicated by the expression that can also be taken for granted and controlled, and that places the result and the life of the learner. The writer demonstrates two points as the cause, which are the areas where improvement is necessary. The first point is the nationalism-like awareness of danger as a strong part of the background of citizenship education in Japan, and this is, therefore, necessary for understanding citizenship. The second point is that only understanding morality is insufficient. Morality and personal freedom and rights are understood as a binary opposition, and moral education consists of the totalitarian thoughts that the Constitution of Japan denies.
新潟大学学術リポジトリリンク: